Well, we're fucked. [NSA] (12)

1 Name: Snowden [Del]

Hey, just wanted to let you guys know that they're watching Cirno. We should probably do something, right?

2 Name: キタ━━━━━━━━( ・∀・)━━━━━━━━!!!! [Del]

If they get to watch, we get to watch. It's only fair. Why should they have all the fun, studying the habits of their neighbours, our neighbours, themselves, ourselves, and complete strangers.


3 Name: キタ━━━━━━━━( ・∀・)━━━━━━━━!!!! [Del]

Well for me & my fellow 31337 h4Xorz, this isn't too much of a problem.

4 Name: キタ━━━━━━━━( ・∀・)━━━━━━━━!!!! [Del]

Moar liek 2MENesecrets amirite?

5 Name: Daedalus [Del]

You must not let them initialize the Morpheus protocol.

7 Name: キタ━━━━━━━━( ・∀・)━━━━━━━━!!!! [Del]

Encryption and back doors. I told you about truecrypt Jisaku Jiens, but did you listen?

8 Name: キタ━━━━━━━━( ・∀・)━━━━━━━━!!!! [Del]

They claim to have backdoors even into that:

9 Name: キタ━━━━━━━━( ・∀・)━━━━━━━━!!!! [Del]

That's what I told you, truecrypt has backdoors, you should use LUKS.

10 Name: キタ━━━━━━━━( ・∀・)━━━━━━━━!!!! [Del]

I've had trouble with LUKS causing random reboots. That doesn't really instill a lot of confidence in the ability of it's authors to write secure software.

11 Name: キタ━━━━━━━━( ・∀・)━━━━━━━━!!!! [Del]

>>9 I concur with >>10-san. While Truecrypt is claimed to have backdoors by what others claim is a hoax, LUKS is developed by Google, and thus implicitly untrustworthy.

12 Name: キタ━━━━━━━━( ・∀・)━━━━━━━━!!!! [Del]

But Truecrypt has insecurities in the MBR so it's worthless for full disk encryption.

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...