Chan like old 4chan? (34)

28 Name: キタ━━━━━━━━( ・∀・)━━━━━━━━!!!! [Del]

>>27 I find this fascinating. If the less the better, then consequentially the best forum is empty, and talking to one self the most intelligent intercourse. No doubt, however, that the more participants, the more irrelevant chatter, drowning the signal in noise. Is the signal perchance subjective? Or is the noise a symptom of insufficient meta-discourse?

I postulate that the number of individual contributing bodies is irrelevant, and quality is an inverse function of post frequency. This reduces the greater internet fuckwad conundrum to the question: What post frequency is optimal?